תאריך: 20/03/2015, 11:40    

According to the IDF policy to drive transparency in testing and investigation of unusual events that occurred during a “Cliff” (8 July 2014 – 26 August 2014) and previous updates, was allowed to publish information regarding the decisions of the judge in a series of individual events.

The military prosecutor’s Office continues to receive complaints regarding alleged occurrence of unusual events. Many of the complaints are served on behalf of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, or by non-governmental organizations – Israelis, Palestinians, or international waters.
So does advocate to identify cases requiring an examination or investigation.
Any information or complaints of alleged misconduct through the preliminary examination in order to assess their credibility if they are concrete. It is that they trusted
Faces and concrete enough, they are moved to the military Advocate General for a decision on whether to open a criminal investigation or alleged case to determine the Joint Chiefs for factual examination.

As I posted previously, Chief of the General staff, General Benjamin (Benny), Gantz
In the midst of the operation, that the mechanism of popular enquiry, led by champion, will the adverse events occurred during the operation. The Mission of the joint mechanism is gathering data and relevant materials and learn facts about unusual events that allegedly occurred
During the operation, in order to advocate full information as possible to enable him to decide whether there are grounds for a criminal investigation, and for the lessons and operational recommendations to help prevent future adverse events. Recently appointed to head the Joint Chiefs service Gen. Yitzhak Eitan, the changer.
Col. Noam Tibbon.

So far have been clear by the joint mechanism in relation to claims over
120. Of these, 65 events already examined and were referred to the military prosecutor to
Making a decision. From these events, compared with six cases decided by the Chief Military Prosecutor to open a criminal investigation. These investigations are conducted or completed subtle and mtzayan were transferred to the military prosecutor. In relation to 17 other events decided the judge handling finished without opening a criminal investigation,
After you review the findings and materials gathered by the mechanism and found there activities of IDF forces involved to reasonable suspicion for committing a criminal offense. At the same time, in relation to some of these events finds the judge saw fit to recommend operational lessons learned. In relation to certain events was decided on when the case is that it hasn’t any involvement of IDF troops in the incident. In relation to some of the events that have been tested and were referred to, the Chief Military Prosecutor because it needs more information to make a decision and thus were these events to complete.
Dozens of other events still are under examination by the mechanism, and their findings are expected to be made later.

In addition, following the allegations that established on reasonable suspicion to resist committing a criminal offense without having clearly by the joint mechanism, so far the judge
To open a criminal investigation in relation to 13 events. Out of these criminal investigations, the Chief Military Prosecutor for the closure of two without taking criminal action or
Any disciplinary action, as detailed below. Other proposals or conduct investigations completed and mtzayan were transferred to the military prosecutor.
All criminal investigations are conducted thoroughly and efficiently by a special investigation team in the military police to investigate the alleged incidents in a cliff “. This team was given to
So testimony from soldiers and many commanders and given the evidence of a significant number of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip who witnessed some of the events.

In relation to events about received referrals, responded to an organization or individual to contact.

 

Cases examined by the joint mechanism, in which the judge decides on the closure

1. allegation regarding the deaths of the Abu Aita in Tel alzathr (24 July 2001)

Publications in the press and with calls from human rights organizations
Transferred to the military prosecutor’s Office, claims that on 24 July 2014, under assault from the air of the alzathr mound, אלעג’רמי killed five civilians on the Abu Aita, inside the building. Subsequently, the interrogation policy of the Chief Military Prosecutor, has decided to transfer the case to the joint mechanism.

The factual findings by the mechanism and the Chief Military Prosecutor, revealed that the supposed attacked a warehouse fighting–active military of senior Hamas terrorist, Ahmed אלעג’רמי. Before the attack, IDF warehouse several detailed telephone warnings which were residents of the building where the warehouse fight
And several adjacent buildings were expected to suffer as a result of the attack, to be evacuated from their homes. In addition, the roof structure where warning shots was the warehouse and to an adjacent building roof that was damaged significantly as a result of the attack, as part of a drill press
“Roof. During this period, predicted many people leave these buildings. The attack was carried out after an evaluation that was based in nearby buildings and had not expected to hurt civilians as a result of the attack.

In practice, is that the attack killed five civilians on the Abu Aita and wounded others. Apparently not until the end does the dead leaves the building nearby was asked specifically, or another building nearby was hit by significantly more than they anticipate.

After examining the factual findings and materials collected by the joint mechanism, the judge found that the order procedures were inconsistent with the provisions of Israeli law and the rules of international law. The decision to attack was made by the competent officials and assault against a military objective intention of – Hassan countermeasures. The attack increased in line with the principle of proportionality, since when considering
At the civilians don’t hurt estimated that as a result of it, and that the extent of the damage won’t be anticipated casual overpriced in relation to the expected military advantage to get her, and apparently this was impossible under the circumstances explained. The attack also was later taken a series of precautionary measures, designed to reduce the harm to civilians. Among other things, was given a warning targeted the buildings are expected to suffer from the attack and aerial observation was holding the event to confirm removal.

On the background, could not find a judge that IDF activity stimulates reasonable suspicion to a criminal offense. Reducer, ordered when an event without opening a criminal investigation and not take further steps towards those involved.

2. allegation regarding a vulnerability in the school in Al-Bureij and UNRWA school in nocirat (25 July 2001)
In reporting
A sales advocate, revealed that on July 25, 2001, IDF forces attacked a school in Al-Bureij and UNRWA school in nocirat (initial report claimed that one of the wounded five civilians, attacks but reported later that people were not harmed in the incident). Consequently, and in accordance with the policy of investigation judge, decided to transfer the case to the joint mechanism.

The factual findings collected by the joint mechanism and to counsel.
, Indicate that the main attack event occurred on 25 July 2014 against IDF forces in the Gaza Strip in an area east of Al-Bureij, using mortar and anti-tank missile (anti-tank missiles). The event killed Sergeant guy levy and wounded another soldier was. In addition to shooting it, shooting too steep a path to other forces in the sector, including by gunfire that hit exactly where building was one of the Division. IDF technologies systems detected in real time that the firing was carried out from two areas – shooting mortars and anti-tank missiles from the area of Al-Burj, very near to school, by mortar fire from the area of nocirat, near the UNRWA school and adjacent (distance
Feet) to center of the UNRWA sanitation, welfare, welfare, food supply and employment. For example, this area is used as a residential complex, known as IDF forces fighting activities of terrorist groups Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad during the operation.

In an attempt to stop the attack and cripple the firing, IDF forces carried out targeted towards tank points of them recognized that executed by gunfire near the school in El-Bureij, while being careful not to damage the school itself. Apparently, as a result of one of the shells fired
Damaged school walls (but no shells landed inside the school). As stated, no late report claimed that any civilian casualty.

At the same time, active in the nocirat several times accurate aerial fire people identified as having participated directly in the steep f to IDF forces apparently as a result of one of the fire toward the bomber was within a few dozen yards from the UNRWA school in nocirat, the school’s wall (but not by any of the school). As stated, no late report alleges that any citizen.
Injured by the gunfire.

After examining the factual findings and materials collected by the joint mechanism, the judge found that the attacks were consistent with the provisions of
Israeli law and the rules of international law. The decisions about the attacks received by the authorized parties. The attacks were directed against legitimate military objectives – active participants in hostilities directly fired at IDF forces, attacks have risen in line with the principle of proportionality, since when decision-making which estimated that the damage would not be anticipated by the casual excessive in relation to the military advantage expected to be accepted. Also, the attacks were carried out
Of measures taken to reduce civilian casualties and the troops were UNRWA sites aware, despite what appears to be an attempt by terrorist elements to get for shooting at IDF forces.

On the background, could not find a judge that IDF activity stimulates reasonable suspicion to a criminal offense. As a parent, the judge finished handling without opening a criminal investigation and not take further steps towards those involved.

3. allegation regarding the deaths of 31 people in attacks on the Al-and around beet in Jack (July 30, 2014)

In various media reports alleged that on 30 July IDF forces by 2014 targeted people who were in the market for Jack during the cease-fire and as a result of attacks killed between 15 to 17 people, including children, rescue officials and journalists.
Consequently, and in accordance with the policy of investigation judge, decided to transfer
The case for the joint mechanism.

After transferring the case to the joint mechanism, was transferred to the military prosecutor’s Office of a human rights organization, which costs description of the same event.
According to the stipulated in the bid, the incident took place instead at a distance of 150 metres from the market in Jack, rather than the market itself. According to, the event began in shell the civilians Al-beet something on the roof of their House, which led to the deaths of seven family members.
Following the injury, began to band together in an open compound next to the family home, where paramedics, media and others. During the gathering, hitting instead two additional shells which led to the deaths of 21 worshippers instead. He also said that other shells also were killed by a man who was in a nearby house and two people belonging to the civil defense of the terrorist organization Hamas, in total, according to said 31 people were killed in the incident.
Another argued that overall the event fired 16 shells.
The factual findings by the mechanism and the Chief Military Prosecutor, revealed that the main event at 4:10 pm, then performed shooting anti-tank missile (anti-tank missiles) towards IDF forces operating in an open area on the outskirts of the neighborhood c. Immediately after missile, carried out the massive and continuous firing of mortar shells out of the built-up area in the neighborhood toward the troops.
As a result of IDF soldier was hit by gunfire and the other soldiers in the area were at risk, and how to start fire and the situation was the power data (including tank couldn’t move from his place due to a fault), the commanders in the field was that bahsot fire may attempt to kidnap a soldier. During firing the forces spotted five points in built-up areas are done shooting at IDF forces, nevertheless, no IDF forces returned fire toward the sources because of their location near sensitive “(ל”אתרים, “sensitive” sites are civilian sites are entitled to special protection from attack under martial law (like
Medical facilities) and other civilian sites to be treated with special attention for reasons of policy, even if there is no legal obligation to do so (like schools); These sites are identified and marked in the IDF’s operational systems).

At approx. 16 shnmshch firing mortars towards IDF forces, troops, several times, a smokescreen for your benefit and the firing of mortars at them. At 5 p.m., after firing mortars towards the built-up forces continues, for the risk of their lives, the two forces to locate additional sources of fire, which carried most of the shooting at the troops. After that one of the points is far enough מ”אתרים feel the fire” is limited to the transfer of five mortars, aiming to stop the firing. The shooting was carried out with mortars, having found that there is no other alternative available to carry out the shooting, including an alternative, which is expected to get the required operational purpose. In this context, also weighed the possibility of carrying out of 155 mm artillery shells explosive in order to respond to the threat posed to soldiers. This alternative was rejected
Due to the assessment because matter-of-fact damage expected as a result of firing the mortars would be smaller.

After about 18 minutes by the first mortars made by troops toward the source of fire, and the fire from this point, the fierce fire of ten mortar shells toward the source of fire. After that shooting, firing mortars towards IDF forces only about forty minutes after the shooting, the Israeli army reported civilian casualties.

Another upload of the findings because the forces at the time of the event the chance that civilians will be harmed by fire is small. First, before the land maneuver in space c executed
Extensive population warning, according to information in the hands of the forces leading to the evacuation of the majority of the civilian population that cell surface. Another population warning was made two days before the event, on July 28, in order to keep civilians away from the war zone. In addition, ongoing aerial scans performed in the period preceding the incident, civil movement not detected on the streets and in open areas in the neighborhood — where the risk of being hurt by mortar fire is generally larger than indoors. In real time, not available to the air forces observation measures available. So, even if not completely excluded the presence of civilians in the present evaluation, most of the population and not been observed in the period preceding the event, the understanding was that the chance that it will decline as a result of the limited shooting is small.

In retrospect, the intersection of the task forces with the complaints received by the judge, that, probably, one of the shells first firing carried out by IDF forces hit the roof of the Al-beets and caused the deaths of seven family members while they were on the roof; And two shells from the two groups carried out by IDF forces attacked people onlookers near the Beit El-beet following the first injury. Aside this, the possibility has not been ruled out that the civilian casualties during the incident, occurred as a result of gunfire and Palestinian terrorist groups, given the scope for their extensive mortars from this area during
The event.

Beyond the supposed intelligence information shows that apparently six of those killed in the incident are operatives, and the number of civilians killed is lower than claimed.
More
Raised from the findings that the event should not take place during a cease-fire in Jack. The IDF announced unilateral humanitarian ceasefire between 00:00 the same
Day, but that does not apply in a number of specific areas in which IDF forces operated, including (as well as several other areas). So, communication and publications delivered messages to the Palestinian side.

After examining the factual findings and materials collected by the joint mechanism, the judge found that the shooting was carried out in accordance with the provisions of Israeli law
And rules of international law. The shooting set to mortars and operatives in order to neutralize them from performing intense continuous shooting to IDF forces, which put them under actual and imminent threat to life. Before the performance and during firing, IDF forces operating in restraint and judgment, and have taken a number of precautionary measures to prevent or at least minimize, civilian casualties. First failed completely, and then tried to interrupt him and stopped by creating a smoke screen. After the shooting stopped, not examined various alternatives for carrying out firing at the sources and the available alternatives and effectiveness, the one expected to cause damage to the casual at least compared to other alternatives. Even then, the shooting was done in a manner and limited.

As the assault on the principle of proportionality, the Chief Military Prosecutor, the likelihood of your Sir, considering the information that was in front of him at the same time, both with regard to the necessary operations on the ceasefire and neutralize the risk posed to powers and regarding the expected civilian casualties as a result of the attack. The judge found that the event occurred and the coincidences dangling things military commander was not supposed to anticipate – the shell caused extensive damage to the first citizens Group (the Al-expel) hit the roof when he actually spent about citizens Group (while the chances of penetrating the shell structure and cause similar damage to civilians who were staying in it is lower); And the extensive harm caused to the other group of citizens who hatchle outside Al-beets, following the injury. At the time the decision on the second execution, was not known to harm IDF forces at the Al-beets, not the crowd near the El-beet. So, when at the same time didn’t fire mortars towards IDF forces, which makes them a real and immediate danger. Against this background, the judge found.
Because the census tract damage that casual won’t be excessive anticipated in relation to the military advantage expected to be received from the shooting, was unreasonable in the circumstances, given the information that was before him. Therefore, the judge that didn’t fall IDF activity defect, and although eventually caused postmortem tragic outcome does not throw in retrospect about legality.
On the background, could not find a judge that IDF activity stimulates reasonable suspicion to a criminal offense. As a parent, the judge finished handling without opening a criminal investigation and not take further steps towards those involved.

4. the claim about the wounding of 10 people as a result of the attacks on UNRWA school in Georgia (near the mosque Omar Ibn Al-Khatab) (July 31, 2014)
In the reports
Various communication and reporting of UN OCHA (Office for the coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) said that on the 31 July 2014 IDF forces fired several shells toward the mosque of Omar Ibn Al-Khatab on Jedi. According to reports of the shooting struck at home.
UNRWA’s school, and 10 civilians injured when a school used as a shelter (two seriously). Consequently, and in accordance with the policies of the judge’s investigations, it was decided to transfer the case to the joint mechanism.

The factual findings gathered by the mechanism and the Joint Chiefs to judge, not for the attacks were carried out by IDF forces, however, found in real-time technologies launch path of NATO rocket from the Gaza Strip, apparently by Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and hit near the mosque at the time. Given that the harm to people at school caused by the Palestinian terrorist organizations, the judge ordered the end of treatment.

 
5. allegation regarding the deaths of 10 people in attacks on the Abu Najm in Georgia (August 3, 2014)
Turn
Of human rights passed to the military prosecutor’s Office, alleges that on 3 August 2014, eight people were killed as a result of the attack by Abu Najm.
In other media reports that 10 people were killed in the attack, and that two of the victims are activists of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad — dnian Mansur and Abdel Nasser אלעג’ורי. Another attack occurred in this publication that killed five civilians (the Abu Najm) in a house where two activists of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the next three were killed. Consequently, and in accordance with the policies of the judge’s investigations, it was decided to transfer the case to the joint mechanism.
The findings
The factual information gathered by the mechanism and to judge the intent to attack before.
Mansour dnian, a senior commander in the terrorist organization, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a rate equivalent to, that was responsible for the Organization’s activities in the North of the Gaza Strip and responsible for all the Organization’s intelligence case, in attack when the House of Muhammad Najam. During the planning process, the estimated that perhaps there are civilians in the building, but when
Not be excessive in relation to the significant military advantage expected to be obtained as a result of the attack. It should be noted in this context that the estimated that building there is one residential apartment, apartment where he was. The building was designed with an accurate arm and
To achieve the goal of reducing damage to adjacent buildings. Also, different tests were performed to examine the extent of the casualties in the adjacent buildings.

In retrospect, it turned out that the attack killed the target dnian, Mansour, and Nasser אלעג’ורי processor, senior military organization of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and wounded Imad Al-Masri, who is Deputy Mansour dnian, and two other terrorist operatives (lajjun from Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Al Qassem, Hamas). It is also based on the reports that the attack killed eight other civilians – five at Abu Najam who was seized and three at home.

After examining the factual findings and materials collected by the joint mechanism, the judge found that strike procedures were inconsistent with the provisions of Israeli law and the rules of international law. The decision to attack was made by the competent officials and legitimate objective – senior commander in the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
The attack increased in line with the principle of proportionality, as when considering the estimated that the extent of the damage won’t be anticipated casual overpriced in relation to the expected military advantage
To receive a packet. In addition, asault in taking any precautionary reduction
The attacks on civilians, especially those in adjacent buildings, among others, by selecting
Type of armament and performing real time observation. Another is that a specific warning before the attack the structure which was the target and attack the inhabitants of nearby buildings, was not charged legally and was expected to frustrate the purpose of the attack.

On the background, the judge did not find that IDF activity stimulates reasonable suspicion to a criminal offense. A judge ordered the end of the event handling without opening a criminal investigation and not take further steps towards those involved.

6. claim regarding the deaths of six people in an attack on the Gaza City albakri (4 August 2014)
Publications
In the media, and human rights organizations leads to the Mag, loaded
That on 4 August 2014, killed five members of the Al Bakri and another person who was
At home, as a result of the attack by the IDF, some publication revealed that two of the dead – Ramadan albakri and Ibrahim El-shraavi were active in the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and four fatalities were civilians. Consequently, and in accordance with the policies of the judge’s investigations, it was decided to transfer the case to the joint mechanism.

The factual findings gathered by the mechanism and to judge the assault.
Intention towards Amar alrachim, a senior commander in the corresponding hierarchy to become, in the terrorist organization, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, who was at the home of Ramadan albakri, active in Islamic Jihad. During the planning process, the estimated that perhaps are several civilians, and that the scope of these civilians will not be excessive in relation to the significant military advantage expected to be obtained as a result of the attack. The building was designed with armament and that to achieve the purpose of reducing the attack damage to adjacent buildings.

In retrospect, as a result of the attack seriously injured was Amar alrachim, destination, attack and killed Ibrahim Al shraavi, a senior commander with rank equivalent to Meg in the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Ramadan albakri, active in the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and four civilians.

After examining the factual findings and materials collected by the joint mechanism, the judge found that strike procedures were inconsistent with the provisions of Israeli law and the rules of international law. The decision to attack was made by the competent officials and legitimate objective – Commander senior Islamic Jihad. The attack increased in line with the principle of proportionality, as when considering the estimated that the extent of the damage won’t be anticipated casual overpriced in relation to the expected military advantage to get her. In addition, asault in taking any precautionary reduction of civilian casualties, especially those found in adjacent buildings, among others, by choosing the type of armament and performing real time observation. Another is that a specific warning before the attack the structure which was the target and attack the inhabitants of nearby buildings, was not charged legally and was expected to frustrate the purpose of the attack.

On the background, the judge did not find that IDF activity stimulates reasonable suspicion to a criminal offense. A judge ordered the end of the event handling without opening a criminal investigation and not take further steps towards those involved.

7. claim regarding the deaths of Abu dahruj family in Al-zovida (23 August 2014)
Publications
In the media, and human rights organizations leads to the military prosecutor’s Office, claims that on 23 August 2014, killed five Abu dahruj family in Al-zovida, as a result of IDF airstrike on a report published by human rights organisation, also noted that one of those killed, Abu dahruj, reindeer is an active military
The Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Consequently, according to the judge’s investigations policy, it was decided to
The transfer of the case to the joint mechanism.

The factual findings by the mechanism and to judge that at the time, at midnight, the IDF fighter missile bomb that purpose to a weapons store was in an open area about 100 yards from the building where Abu dahruj family tea. As part of the execution, taken various precautions to avoid civilian casualties, and they escort a attack, and using small arms and accurate. However, during the assault, apparently due to technical failure, unexpected, ran a designated path and struck the Al-dahruj. Shortly thereafter, another bomb hit was launched at the weapons Depot.

As noted above, it becomes clear in retrospect that one of those killed at the Abu dahruj, IL, is an activist of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, although as noted –
No intention to attack.

After examining the factual findings and materials collected by the joint mechanism, the judge found that the order procedures were inconsistent with the provisions of Israeli law and the rules of international law. The decision to attack was made by the competent officials, and an attack against a military target intent – weaponry storage the decision.
On implementation was not to evaluate the operational factors, cause any damage casual per person
Or purchase non-military purpose (and therefore the attack position in compliance with the principle of proportionality). Also, the asault in taking various precautions to prevent civilian casualties, among others, by choosing the type of armaments, the timing and execution of a real-time view of the warehouse which was targeted for attack. The fact that technical failure actually unexpected, that lead to stiitha and attacks on civilians and property, is unfortunate, but does not influence the validity of the action.

On the background, the judge did not find that IDF activity stimulates reasonable suspicion to a criminal offense. Reducer, ordered when an event without opening a criminal investigation and not take further steps towards those involved.

Event that has been tested by the army and the judge ordered a police investigation of his business.
Claim regarding attacks on UNRWA school in Georgia, which led to the deaths of about 20 people (July 30, 2014)
In reports
Received by the advocate, and with calls from human rights groups, claims that
During an IDF attack on 30 July 2001, killing about 20 people and wounded dozens more in UNRWA school located in Georgetown, was used as a shelter in the time of the incident.
Consequently, and in accordance with the policies of the judge’s investigations, it was decided to transfer the case to
The joint mechanism.

The factual findings gathered by the mechanism and presented to the judge, reasonable grounds to suspect that the attack was carried out not in accordance with the rules that IDF forces, ordered.
The judge advocate General to open investigations into the circumstances of the incident.

Events that advocate general ordered investigations of their cases without examining the Joint Chiefs staff

1. allegations of beating detainee resident khaza’ah neighborhood (23 July 2001)
Following
Accepting an appeal on behalf of khaza’ah neighborhood resident, that after his arrest by IDF forces, among others, while handcuffed and blindfolded, he was beaten by soldiers for no reason, ordered the army to open a military police investigation into the circumstances of the incident.

2. allegations of beating detainee resident khaza’ah neighborhood (23 July 2001)
Following
Accepting an appeal on behalf of another, whereby khaza’ah neighborhood resident after his arrest by IDF forces, while handcuffed and blindfolded, he was beaten by soldiers for no reason, ordered the army to open a military police investigation into the circumstances of the incident.

3. allegations of looting in Deir al Balah (in the second half of July 2014)
Following
Accepting an appeal on behalf of a resident of Deir al-Balah, whereby soldiers looted his property, according to said when he fled with his family from his home, during the second half of July, the judge ordered to open a military police investigation into the circumstances of the incident.

4. allegations of looting in Khan Yunis (in the second half of July 2014)
Following
Accepting an appeal on behalf of a resident of Khan Younis that soldiers looted his property, according to said when he fled with his family from his home, during the second half of July, the judge ordered to open a military police investigation into the circumstances of the incident.

5. allegations of beating detainees, residents of Rafah (August 1, 2014)
Following
Accepting an appeal on behalf of two residents of Rafah, stating that after being detained by IDF forces, as they handcuffed and blindfolded, they were beaten by soldiers for no reason, ordered the army to open a military police investigation into the circumstances.

Investigations completed and JAG received a decision concerning

1. allegations of looting in (the second half of July 2014)
Case.
The investigation was closed after the complainant has refrained from giving his testimony before investigators.
This, despite the fact that his representative’s request, the letter informed him that no arrested on arrival to submit evidence. In these circumstances, in the absence of evidence to support the charges and to establish
Suspicion of committing an offence on the part of IDF soldiers, it was decided to close the investigation.

2. allegations of looting in (the second half of July 2014)
Case.
The investigation was closed after the complainant has refrained from giving his testimony before investigators.
This, despite the fact that his representative’s request, the letter informed him that no arrested on arrival to submit evidence. The complainant’s mother had come to give testimony, but notably testimony
Was “hearsay evidence”. In these circumstances, in the absence of admissible evidence provide to support charges and establishing suspicion of felony on the IDF decided to close the investigation.

Translated from Hebrew

Source